for source text and object code, and thus to a high degree ease development
and debugging of programs, and, as Mr O0’Farrell points out, the omissions can
be overcomed by a bit of programming, if the use of these features is
And now for something completely different. On page 7 in INMC80-5, Mr.
B.M. Farrelly of Belfast provides a program for retrieving lost Basic
programs. An excellent idea, and very useful indeed, but the little piece of
code has a couple of errors in it, I’m afraid, since it doesn’t restore all of
Basic’s internal pointers. Only one of them is restored, and, in fact, with a
wrong value. The correct code is shown below:
21 FE 10 7E 23 B7 20 FB 22 FA 10 5E 23 56 EB 7E
23 B6 2B 20 F6 23 23 22 D6 10 22 D8 10 22 DA 10
Like the first version, this code can go anywhere in memory as long as
it doesn’t overwrite the Basic.
Finally I would like to congratulate everyone on the excellent quality
of this magazine. It just grows better and better, and every issue provides me
with many hours of interesting reading. Keep up the good work!
Anders Hejlsberg, Poly-Data, Copenhagen.
FREE PROGRAMS, SOUND & SPEECH
You used to give us occasionally a free program or two to try out on
our domestic Nascoms, but lately you have been less generous with these gifts.
At one time also you were collecting programs of sufficient merit, and selling
copies – or have I got it wrong? Anyway, the rival magazine prints free
programs! In the latest issue it has a version of the Towers of Hanoi. Now it
so happens that I have written a program of the same nature, but of course
much better! I am enclosing a listing of the program in case you are
interested. (See elsewhere in this issue – Ed.) It makes good use of Nascom
graphics, though I have limited the number of disks to five, since we all have
I was very interested in the article on the PHG Electronics Programmable
Sound Generator. I bought a similar item from Easicomp Ltd. The generator
plugs straight into the Nascom motherboard, and has its own built-in speaker.
Like the one reviewed, it uses the AY-3-8910 chip. Control is effected through
ports 2 and 3, with the Nascom 2 LSW2-8 I/O Select switch in the ‘Ext.’
position. Documentation is only fair, but it has not proved too difficult to
program tunes and sundry noises. I have written a program which converts the
Nascom into a keyboard instrument, with a range of three and a half octaves.
It is only monophonic, of course, but the tonal quality can be varied by
adding various harmonics or altering the sound envelope. I could write up a
review of this product if you think it worthwhile. (Please do – Ed-)
Easicomp also advertise a Phonetic Voice Synthesizer at about 150.00.
I would be very interested in a review of this – before I splash out that
amount of money. The Arfon product sounds alright so long as one sticks to the
given limited vocabulary, but to program anything else is, I am told, a
fearsome task, and doesn’t sound too marvellous when accomplished. Now the
Easicomp synthesizer uses 64 phonemes to build an infinite vocabulary, but
what does it sound like? That’s what I want to know.
I look forward eagerly to each issue of the newsletter and hope it
won’t be nearly so long before the next issue appears.
John Waddell, Harrow, Middlesex.
centenemenanantthnan scones ww